2 Responses to “Watch Parental Alienation Review .”

  1. Family Courts are nothing more than criminal racketeering enterprises designed to steal as much money as possible from unsuspecting families and parents. They are not designed to act in the best interests of the children. They allow parental alienation to be perpetrated by one parent against the other that ultimately destroys the child’s relationship with both parents. This is outright criminal child abuse. When a parent uses parental alienation (or one of the 5 categories in the DSM-V desk manual related to parental alienation) that parent should lose custody, be compelled into counseling until further order of the court, and be cut off from children until further order of the court. Even though this change for children would be upsetting, it is temporary change, and children recover. Parental alienation is long term and most often permanent. The children never recover and the relationship with the victim parent is severed forever.

    Family Court was originally set up as a pro se court where parents wanting to divorce could amicably resolve their disputes, split their assets and property, have a decent relationship with their children and then move on. Lawyers saw this as a cash cow, with homes providing a lot of equity in their sale, which the lawyers could glom on to.

    Lawyers have become totally useless in defense of parents being falsely accused of domestic violence, child abuse, and other false allegations being used as a tactic in Family Court to gain unfair advantage in child custody and support issues. Lawyers and radical feminist groups have turned criminal codes into civil codes through the fake domestic violence laws. Then the person falsely accused is saddled with more litigation, more loss of assets and income, and is usually charged with criminal contempt for some amorphous violation of the restraining orders, wherein the civil domestic violence matter is unconstitutionally converted into a criminal matter, without proper notice or probable cause to the unsuspecting Family Court litigant. Domestic violence and child support are frauds perpetrated by the judicial system (government) to extract monies and assets from unsuspecting parents to line the pockets of judges, lawyers, mental health quacks, and others.

    Under the Federal law called Child Support Enforcement Reimbursement to the States, 42 USC Section 658a, the Feds award reimbursement to the states, from anywhere from 66 cents to $3.50 for every dollar of child support awarded, collected, or enforced upon. The money is sent to the states with no strings attached. The reimbursement is put into the general treasury of the state. The first items paid out of the state treasury are judicial salaries and pensions, law enforcement salaries and pensions, politicians’ salaries and pensions, etc. This is a major unconstitutional financial conflict of interest prohibited by the U.S. Supreme Court in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 129 S.Ct. 2252, 556 U.S. 868 (2009). Judges who have a pecuniary (financial) interest in the outcomes of cases cannot sit on those cases because it creates an unconstitutional conflict of interest. Any orders that judges in those cases enter are declared null and void as a result.

    Family Court is multi-billion dollar racketeering fraud and scam. Parental alienation is created by the Family Court to increase dollars for lawyers and the system. Time to end the Family Courts for being a financial fraud.

    Bruce Eden, Director
    Dads Against Discrimination (DADS)–NJ & NY
    973-897-8351 (M-F, 9-5)
    b_eden@verizon.net

    Like

  2. Family Courts are nothing more than criminal racketeering enterprises designed to steal as much money as possible from unsuspecting families and parents. They are not designed to act in the best interests of the children. They allow parental alienation to be perpetrated by one parent against the other that ultimately destroys the child’s relationship with both parents. This is outright criminal child abuse. When a parent uses parental alienation (or one of the 5 categories in the DSM-V desk manual related to parental alienation) that parent should lose custody, be compelled into counseling until further order of the court, and be cut off from children until further order of the court. Even though this change for children would be upsetting, it is temporary change, and children recover. Parental alienation is long term and most often permanent. The children never recover and the relationship with the victim parent is severed forever.

    Family Court was originally set up as a pro se court where parents wanting to divorce could amicably resolve their disputes, split their assets and property, have a decent relationship with their children and then move on. Lawyers saw this as a cash cow, with homes providing a lot of equity in their sale, which the lawyers could glom on to.

    Lawyers have become totally useless in defense of parents being falsely accused of domestic violence, child abuse, and other false allegations being used as a tactic in Family Court to gain unfair advantage in child custody and support issues. Lawyers and radical feminist groups have turned criminal codes into civil codes through the fake domestic violence laws. Then the person falsely accused is saddled with more litigation, more loss of assets and income, and is usually charged with criminal contempt for some amorphous violation of the restraining orders, wherein the civil domestic violence matter is unconstitutionally converted into a criminal matter, without proper notice or probable cause to the unsuspecting Family Court litigant. Domestic violence and child support are frauds perpetrated by the judicial system (government) to extract monies and assets from unsuspecting parents to line the pockets of judges, lawyers, mental health quacks, and others.

    Under the Federal law called Child Support Enforcement Reimbursement to the States, 42 USC Section 658a, the Feds award reimbursement to the states, from anywhere from 66 cents to $3.50 for every dollar of child support awarded, collected, or enforced upon. The money is sent to the states with no strings attached. The reimbursement is put into the general treasury of the state. The first items paid out of the state treasury are judicial salaries and pensions, law enforcement salaries and pensions, politicians’ salaries and pensions, etc. This is a major unconstitutional financial conflict of interest prohibited by the U.S. Supreme Court in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 129 S.Ct. 2252, 556 U.S. 868 (2009). Judges who have a pecuniary (financial) interest in the outcomes of cases cannot sit on those cases because it creates an unconstitutional conflict of interest. Any orders that judges in those cases enter are declared null and void as a result.

    Family Court is multi-billion dollar racketeering fraud and scam. Parental alienation is created by the Family Court to increase dollars for lawyers and the system. Time to end the Family Courts for being a financial fraud.

    Bruce Eden, Director
    Dads Against Discrimination (DADS)–New Jersey & New York
    973-897-8351 (M-F, 9-5)
    b_eden@verizon.net

    Like

Comments & Suggestions are Welcomed